Legal Opinion

Fassberg Construction Co. v. Housing Authority

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 24, 2007No. B181989PublishedCited by 75 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

CROSKEY, J.

Fassberg Construction Company (Fassberg) appeals a judgment, after a jury trial, denying it relief on its complaint and awarding the Housing Authority of the City of Los Angeles (Housing Authority) $3,960,500, exclusive of costs, on its cross-complaint. The action arises from a construction contract between the Housing Authority as owner and Fassberg as general contractor. The jury found that Fassberg breached the contract, that Fassberg knowingly submitted 2,983 “false claims” to the Housing Authority, and that the Housing Authority suffered $1,104,000 in damages resulting…

2Cases cited67 opinions

  1. Vermont Agency of Natural Resources v. United States Ex Rel. StevensSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  2. United States Ex Rel. Marcus v. HessSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
  3. Edwin P. Harrison, and United States of America, Party in Interest v. Westinghouse Savannah River CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1999
  4. Denham v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
  5. Crawford v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1935

62 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by75 opinions

  1. People v. Leonard CA4/1California Court of Appeal · 2014
  2. Hasso v. HapkeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2014
  3. Markow v. RosnerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2016
  4. Holguin v. Dish Network LLCCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2014
  5. Orthopedic Systems, Inc. v. SchleinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011

70 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API