Legal Opinion
1100 PARK LANE ASSOCIATES v. Feldman
California Court of Appeal
Decided February 25, 2008No. A113034PublishedCited by 85 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
KLINE, P. J.
INTRODUCTION
Plaintiff and appellant 1100 Park Lane Associates (Park Lane) filed an unlawful detainer action against its tenant Peter Levis and Levis’s subtenants, defendants and cross-appellants Konrad Feldman and Jennifer Foote-Feldman. The Feldmans filed a cross-complaint for damages against Park Lane, Walter Lembi and Andrew Hawkins (collectively Park Lane cross-defendants). Following dismissal of the unlawful detainer action upon Levis’s giving up his tenancy and the Feldmans’ vacating the apartment, Park Lane cross-defendants filed a special motion to strike the…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Navellier v. SlettenCalifornia Supreme Court · 2002
- Equilon Enterprises v. Consumer Cause, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2002
- Silberg v. AndersonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990
- Briggs v. Eden Council for Hope & OpportunityCalifornia Supreme Court · 1999
- Flatley v. MauroCalifornia Supreme Court · 2006
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by85 opinions
- Wallace v. McCubbinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011
- Haight Ashbury Free Clinics, Inc. v. Happening House VenturesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2010
- Digerati Holdings, LLC v. Young Money Entertainment, LLCCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011
- Summit Bank v. RogersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2012
- Raining Data Corp. v. BarrenecheaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2009
80 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.