Legal Opinion

Shroyer v. Fanning

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided March 3, 2010No. 25351PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEIERHENRY, Justice.

[¶ 1.] Lyn Shroyer filed a petition for a protection order against Lance Fanning on behalf of O.S.F., Shroyer and Fanning’s daughter. The petition alleged Fanning had sexually abused O.S.F. After hearing testimony and argument on the matter, the circuit court granted the protection order in favor of Shroyer and O.S.F. for a period of eighteen months. Fanning appeals.

FACTS AND BACKGROUND

[¶2.] Fanning and Shroyer were romantically involved but never married. During their relationship, Fanning and Shroyer had a child, O.S.F., who was born in April 2005. Fanning and Shroyer…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Grode v. GrodeSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1996
  2. Goeden v. DaumSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2003
  3. Schaefer Ex Rel. S.S. v. LiechtiSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2006
  4. White v. BainSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2008
  5. State v. ShepardSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2009

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Purcell v. BegnaudSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2017
  2. March v. ThursbySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2011
  3. Trumm v. CleaverSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2013
  4. Erickson v. EarleySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2016
  5. Repp v. Van SomerenSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2015

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API