Legal Opinion

Purcell v. Begnaud

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided May 3, 2017No. 27940PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGilbertson, Chief Justice

[¶1.] The circuit court imposed a three-year protection order barring Gregory R. Begnaud from all contact with his two minor children and their mother, Sarah M. Purcell. Begnaud appeals the order with respect to the children. He argues there is no evidence that he has ever physically harmed or threatened the children. We reverse.

Pacts and Procedural History

[¶2.] On June 2, 2016, Purcell petitioned for a protection order against Begnaud. She also requested the parties’ two children, who were eight and seven years old at the time, be granted protection orders against Begnaud. 1 In the petition,…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Santosky v. KramerSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  2. Troxel v. GranvilleSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  3. Gartner v. TempleSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2014
  4. In Re the Guardianship of S.M.N.South Dakota Supreme Court · 2010
  5. MacKaben v. MacKabenSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2015

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Zochert v. Protective Life Ins. Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 2018
  2. State v. MitchellSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2021
  3. State v. TaylorSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2020
  4. Estate of Stoebner v. HuetherSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2019
  5. State v. KlinetobeSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2021

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API