Legal Opinion
March v. Thursby
South Dakota Supreme Court
Decided November 9, 2011No. 25873PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Per curiam
[¶ 1.] Lacy Jo March (March) filed a Petition and Affidavit for Protection Order on November 18, 2010, seeking a protection order against Roger Thursby (Thurs-by). The circuit court granted March the protection order. Thursby appeals, alleging that the findings of fact are insufficient to support the order as signed. Because the findings of fact do not support the protection order the circuit court is reversed.
Facts
[¶ 2.] A hearing on March’s petition for protection order was held on December 17, 2010. March testified as to the reason she sought the protection order. She testified that in…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Sazama v. State Ex Rel. MuilenbergSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2007
- Christians v. ChristiansSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2001
- Grajczyk v. TascaSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2006
- Sjomeling v. StuberSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2000
- Goeden v. DaumSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2003
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Oglala Sioux Tribe v. Mark VargoCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2018
- Agfirst Farmers Coop v. Diamond C DairySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2013
- Agfirst Farmers Cooperative v. Diamond C Dairy, LLCSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2013
- Northland Captial v. RobinsonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2022
- Repp v. Van SomerenSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2015
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.