Erickson v. Earley
South Dakota Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
WILBUR, Justice.
[¶ 1.] Austin Earley appeals from a circuit court order granting Tyler Erickson a permanent order of protection. Earley contends that the circuit court abused its discretion by granting the protection order and that the protection order violates his First Amendment right to free speech. We affirm.
Facts and Procedural History
[¶ 2.] Earley and Erickson are both hunters. The dispute between the two, which ultimately resulted in this protection order, is' primarily over hunting land. Both men are in their mid-thirties.
[¶ 3.] Erickson secured permission from Jim and David…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Frohwerk v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1919
- Gartner v. TempleSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2014
- State v. HaugeSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1996
- State v. CrellySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1981
- State v. AsmussenSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2003
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Stern Oil Co. v. BrownSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2018
- Shayla Nicole Purifoy v. Devine MafaCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2017
- Estate of FoxSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2019
- Doremus v. MorrowSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2017
- State v. ShiblySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2023
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.