Legal Opinion

Trumm v. Cleaver

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided December 4, 2013No. 26662PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ZINTER, Justice.

[¶ 1.] Terri Trumm petitioned for a domestic abuse protection order against Kev-an Cleaver under SDCL chapter 25-10. Terri argued that Kevan’s conduct amounted to stalking under SDCL 22-19A-1. She also argued that, by statutory definition, stalking under SDCL 22-19A-1 constituted domestic abuse under SDCL 25-10-1(1) if the stalking involved family or household members. The circuit court agreed and granted the protection order. On appeal, Kevan argues that the circuit court misinterpreted SDCL 25-10-1(1) and abused its discretion in granting the order. We affirm.

Facts and…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Martinmaas v. EngelmannSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2000
  2. Barnes v. MatznerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2003
  3. Wheeler v. Farmers Mutual Insurance Co. of NebraskaSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2012
  4. In Re the Estate of HamiltonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2012
  5. State v. ErringtonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1981

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Christensen v. QuinnDistrict Court, D. South Dakota · 2014
  2. Bruggeman v. RamosSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2022
  3. Cook v. CookSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2022
  4. Kolda v. City of YanktonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2014
  5. Batchelder v. BatchelderSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2021

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API