Schaefer Ex Rel. S.S. v. Liechti
South Dakota Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
ZINTER, Justice.
[¶ 1.] William Edward Liechti appeals the circuit court’s entry of a stalking protection order. Both parties seek appellate attorney’s fees. We affirm the circuit court’s entry of the protection order and deny both parties’ requests for appellate attorney’s fees.
Facts and Procedural History
[¶ 2.] Doug and Cindy Schaefer (the Schaefer parents) are the parents of S.S., C.S., and K.S., who were fifteen, thirteen, and eleven in the summer of 2004. The Schaefers lived on the edge of Seneca, South Dakota, and operated a farming business. Elda Scheller (Scheller) is the grandmother…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- In the Interest of T.A.South Dakota Supreme Court · 2003
- Goeden v. DaumSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2003
- Dejong v. DejongSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2003
- Baun v. Estate of KramlichSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2003
- Hentz v. City of Spearfish, Department of Public Works, Office of Planning & ZoningSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2002
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Lord v. Hy-Vee Food StoresSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2006
- Toft v. ToftSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2006
- In Re the Estate of LaueSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2010
- White v. BainSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2008
- Donat v. JohnsonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2015
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.