Legal Opinion

Pogue v. Simon

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided July 17, 1905PublishedCited by 9 opinions

From Marion: George H. Burnett, Judge. Action by M. E. Pogue against N. Simon, in which there was a judgment for defendant.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Bean

1. This is an action to recover possession of real property formerly belonging to W. E. Hawkins. On October 12,1895, it was sold at sheriff’s sale on an execution issued on a judgment against Hawkins and in favor of Samuel Heitshu, and purchased by Heitshu. The sale was con*7firmed, and, after the time for redemption had expired, but before the execution of a sheriff’s deed, Heitshu’s interest was seized under an execution on a judgment against him, and sold to one Goodnough. This sale was confirmed, and in due time a sheriff’s deed was regularly executed and delivered to the plaintiff, to whom…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Page v. RogersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1866
  2. Smith v. InglesOregon Supreme Court · 1862
  3. Diamond v. TurnerWashington Supreme Court · 1895
  4. Bloomfield v. HumasonOregon Supreme Court · 1884
  5. Higgins v. . McConnellNew York Court of Appeals · 1892

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. George E. Sebring Co. v. O'RourkeSupreme Court of Florida · 1931
  2. Holmes v. WolfardOregon Supreme Court · 1905
  3. Belieu v. PowerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1921
  4. Budd v. GallierOregon Supreme Court · 1907
  5. Sandblast v. WilliamsOregon Supreme Court · 1969

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API