Smith v. Ingles
Oregon Supreme Court
Error to Multnomah County. On the 9th day of October, 1857, D. C. Ingles, being insolvent and largely indebted, purchased of one Perkins, lots 1 and 8 in block 25, in Portland, and caused them to be conveyed by deed to W. S. and B. E. Ingles, his sons, at that time minors.
Read the full summary
Error to Multnomah County. On the 9th day of October, 1857, D. C. Ingles, being insolvent and largely indebted, purchased of one Perkins, lots 1 and 8 in block 25, in Portland, and caused them to be conveyed by deed to W. S. and B. E. Ingles, his sons, at that time minors. He paid part of the purchase money out of his own funds, and .borrowed the balance — five hundred and fifty dollars — from one Davenport, to whom he executed a note, and mortgage on said lots ; and afterwards, on the 24th of Hay, 1858, he borrowed eight hundred dollars of plaintiff, Smith, to pay said Davenport; and to…
1Opinion of the CourtPrim, J.
The legal title to the lots in question was in "W. S. and B. E. Ingles, who were minor sons of D. O. Ingles. The facts proven and admitted show that D. C. Ingles made the purchase, advanced the money, and caused the conveyance to be made to them for his own use and benefit, and with intent to place said property beyond the reach of his creditors.
The main question to be decided here is, whether. the judgment at law of Burns against D. C. Ingles became a lien on these lots, while there was nothing of record to show that he had any interest in them whatever. In other words, is a judgment at law…
2Cited by17 opinions
- Klamath Irrigation District v. United StatesOregon Supreme Court · 2010
- Heider v. DietzOregon Supreme Court · 1963
- Security State Bank v. LuebkeOregon Supreme Court · 1987
- Eldredge v. Mill Ditch Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1919
- In re Estes & CarterDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 1880
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.