Legal Opinion

Sandblast v. Williams

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided November 13, 1969PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDenecke, J.

This is a partition suit; however, the issues are not those ordinarily encountered in a suit for partition.

The defendant Prances Williams and her then hus band, Charles, purchased real property on contract. The "Williams later were divorced and Charles transferred his interest in the contract to Frances and the transfer was recorded. After Mrs. Williams defaulted in her payments to the vendors, the vendors brought a foreclosure suit. In settlement of the suit Mrs. Williams delivered a quitclaim deed for the property to the vendors’ attorney, the deed to be delivered to the vendors in 60 days…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Cross v. CampbellOregon Supreme Court · 1944
  2. Pogue v. SimonOregon Supreme Court · 1905
  3. Steiner, Inc. v. HILLOregon Supreme Court · 1951
  4. Rogue River Fruit & Produce Ass'n v. Gillen-Chambers Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1915

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Hofmann v. Von WirthAlaska Supreme Court · 1995
  2. Wallstreet Properties, Inc. v. GassnerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1981
  3. Caro v. HansenCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1994
  4. Skourtes v. SchaerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1978
  5. Sprague v. BrownOregon Supreme Court · 1978

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API