Legal Opinion
Holmes v. Conter
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided May 15, 1942No. 33,020PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Holt, Justice.
Action to quiet title to a lot in the city of St. Paul.
The action was tried to the late Judge O’Brien, who made and filed findings upon which judgment was entered in favor of plaintiff. A motion made by defendants, after Judge O’Brien’s death, to vacate the judgment and grant a new trial on newly discovered evidence and in the interest of justice was granted by Judge Parks, and Ms order sustained on appeal to this court. Holmes v. Conter, 209 Minn. 144, 295 N. W. 649. The new trial before Judge McNally resulted in plaintiff’s favor. Motions for amended findings or a new trial…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Holmes v. ConterSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1941
- Stokoe v. St. Paul, Minneapolis & Manitoba Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1889
- Grossman v. Lockedell & SonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1931
3Cited by6 opinions
- Cooper v. HoeglundSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1946
- Clark v. Chicago & North Western Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1948
- Tate v. KelleyDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1957
- Rivera v. MandsagerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1949
- Haglin v. AshleySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1942
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.