Legal Opinion

Grossman v. Lockedell & Son

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided November 13, 1931No. 28,589PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtStone, J.

Replevin for an automobile, wherein plaintiff claims as the as-signee of the vendor in a conditional sales contract wherein defend ant Silver was the vendee. The latter appeals from an order denying his motion for a neAv trial after a verdict directed for plaintiff. The other defendants are not parties to the appeal.

The purchase price of the car Avas $767.60, and at the time the Avrit issued there remained unpaid $86.40. There was a default of payment in hut one of the monthly instalments of $28.80. Additional breaches of the contract are claimed, in that defendant had permitted the property…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Swaney v. HasaraSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1925
  2. Flint v. WebbSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1878
  3. Spooner v. Bay St. Louis SyndicateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1890

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Holmes v. ConterSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1942
  2. Kettwig v. Aero Investment Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1934
  3. Timm v. SchneiderSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1938

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API