Haglin v. Ashley
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
Julius J. Olson, Justice.
Plaintiffs’ suit to compel specific performance of an .agreement to sell certain shares of stock in Northwestern Casket Company resulted in findings and judgment against defendant Ashley. Although Ashley and Downer were both named as defendants, process could not be served upon Downer because he was a resident of New York, and he refused to become a voluntary party. Accordingly, we shall refer to Ashley as the defendant. His motion for amended findings being denied, judgment was entered, and he appeals.
As its name implies, the casket company, a domestic corporation,…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- First National Bank v. Corporation Securities Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1915
- Falk v. the Dirigold CorporationSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1928
- Holmes v. ConterSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1942
- Steward v. Nutrena Feed Mills, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1932
3Cited by5 opinions
- Karger v. WangerinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1950
- Lehman v. StoutSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1961
- Aztec Film Productions v. Tucson Gas & Electric Co.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1969
- Clark v. Chicago & North Western Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1948
- Blankenfeld v. SmithSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1971