Legal Opinion

Rivera v. Mandsager

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided April 1, 1949No. 34,870PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Frank T. Gallagher, Justice.

Appeal from an order of the district court denying the motion of defendant Sontag for a new trial.

Plaintiff’s action, against Arthur F. Sontag and John Mandsager, was for the recovery of damages for injuries sustained by plaintiff as the result of a collision between the automobiles owned and driven by the two defendants. The jury returned a verdict for plaintiff against Sontag and found no cause of action against Mand-sager.

The accident occurred at the intersection of county roads Nos. 9 and 72 in Viding township, Clay county, on a clear and sunny afternoon.…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Christianson v. Chicago, St. Paul, Minneapolis & Omaha Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1896
  2. Hill v. WinsorMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1875
  3. Guile v. GreenbergSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1934
  4. Maust v. MaustSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1946
  5. Wilson v. DavidsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1944

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Jablinske v. EckstromSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1956
  2. Bush v. HavirSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1958
  3. Gardner v. GermainSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1962
  4. Meyer v. MitchellSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1957
  5. Holz v. PearsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1949

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API