Rivera v. Mandsager
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
Frank T. Gallagher, Justice.
Appeal from an order of the district court denying the motion of defendant Sontag for a new trial.
Plaintiff’s action, against Arthur F. Sontag and John Mandsager, was for the recovery of damages for injuries sustained by plaintiff as the result of a collision between the automobiles owned and driven by the two defendants. The jury returned a verdict for plaintiff against Sontag and found no cause of action against Mand-sager.
The accident occurred at the intersection of county roads Nos. 9 and 72 in Viding township, Clay county, on a clear and sunny afternoon.…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Christianson v. Chicago, St. Paul, Minneapolis & Omaha Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1896
- Hill v. WinsorMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1875
- Guile v. GreenbergSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1934
- Maust v. MaustSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1946
- Wilson v. DavidsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1944
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Jablinske v. EckstromSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1956
- Bush v. HavirSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1958
- Gardner v. GermainSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1962
- Meyer v. MitchellSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1957
- Holz v. PearsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1949
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.