Legal Opinion
Sobocinski v. Statewide Grievance Committee
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided June 26, 1990No. 13829PublishedCited by 24 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtGlass, J.
The dispositive issue in this appeal is whether the statewide grievance committee1 (SGC) is an administrative agency as defined in General Statutes § 4-166 (l)2 of our Uniform Administrative Procedure Act (UAPA). The plaintiff, Nancy L. Sobocinski, has appealed, from a decision of the trial court dismissing her appeal from a decision of the SGC. The trial court held that the SGC is not an administrative agency as defined by § 4-166 (1), and, as a result, dismissed the plaintiffs appeal for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. We agree with the trial court’s determination.
*519The record reveals…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Heslin v. Connecticut Law Clinic of Trantolo & TrantoloSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1983
- Statewide Grievance Committee v. RozbickiSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1989
- Statewide Grievance Committee v. PresnickSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1990
- Catholic Family & Community Services v. Commission on Human RightsConnecticut Appellate Court · 1985
3Cited by24 opinions
- Pinsky v. Statewide Grievance CommitteeSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1990
- Weiss v. Statewide Grievance CommitteeSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1993
- Statewide Grievance Committee v. WhitneySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1993
- Connor v. Statewide Grievance CommitteeSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2002
- Statewide Grievance Committee v. EgbarinConnecticut Appellate Court · 2001
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.