Legal Opinion

Statewide Grievance Committee v. Whitney

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided November 16, 1993No. 14594PublishedCited by 36 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKatz, J.

The Superior Court ordered that the defendant, Norman E. Whitney, be suspended from the practice of law for one year after he refused on several occasions to attend a pretrial conference in a criminal matter. In this appeal from the judgment of the trial *831court imposing suspension, the defendant claims that: (1) the practice of scheduling mandatory pretrial conferences in criminal matters is unconstitutional under the state and federal constitutions; (2) General Statutes §§ 53a-172 and 53a-1731 are unconstitutional under the state and federal constitutions; and (3) mandatory criminal pretrial…

2Cases cited36 opinions

  1. Brady v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. Santobello v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  3. Bordenkircher v. HayesSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  4. Poe v. UllmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  5. Corbitt v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 1978

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by36 opinions

  1. Copas v. Commissioner of CorrectionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1995
  2. Dowling v. SlotnikSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1998
  3. State v. McElveenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2002
  4. State v. ReveloSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2001
  5. Williams v. RagagliaSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2002

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API