Legal Opinion

Statewide Grievance Committee v. Presnick

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided May 22, 1990No. 13694PublishedCited by 49 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCovello, J.

This is an appeal by the defendant, Daniel V. Presnick, an attorney at law, from a judgment of the Superior Court that suspended him from the practice of law for one year. The principal issues are: (1) whether grievance panels, reviewing committees and the statewide grievance committee function as an unconstitutionally created court in violation of article fifth, § 1 of the Connecticut constitution; (2) whether the defendant was denied due process in violation of the fourteenth amendment to the United States constitution and article first, § 10 of the Connecticut constitution; and (3) whether…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Northern Pipeline Construction Co. v. Marathon Pipe Line Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
  3. Crowell v. BensonSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
  4. Wisconsin v. ConstantineauSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  5. Codd v. VelgerSupreme Court of the United States · 1977

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by49 opinions

  1. Pinsky v. Statewide Grievance CommitteeSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1990
  2. Hunt v. PriorSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1996
  3. Matza v. MatzaSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1993
  4. Weiss v. Statewide Grievance CommitteeSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1993
  5. Statewide Grievance Committee v. WhitneySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1993

44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API