Legal Opinion
Catholic Family & Community Services v. Commission on Human Rights
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided April 2, 1985No. 2708PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Dupont, C.P.J.
The sole issue of this appeal is whether an administrative appeal taken from a decision of a hearing officer appointed by the chairman of the commission on human rights and opportunities (CHRO) should have been dismissed by the trial court for failure to serve the hearing officer. The trial court held that “agency” as used in General Statutes § 4-183 (b)1 refers to the hearing officer rather than to *465the commission and that since the plaintiff had served the commission, its action was abatable.
General Statutes § 4-183 (b) requires that service be made upon the agency. General…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Rybinski v. State Employees' Retirement CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1977
- Wroblewski v. Lexington Gardens, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1982
- Connecticut Natural Gas Corp. v. Department of Public Utility ControlConnecticut Appellate Court · 1983
3Cited by9 opinions
- Chestnut Realty, Inc. v. Commission on Human Rights & OpportunitiesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1986
- Sobocinski v. Statewide Grievance CommitteeSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1990
- Donis v. Connecticut Board of Examiners in PodiatrySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
- Klug v. Inland Wetlands CommissionConnecticut Appellate Court · 1989
- Board of Education v. Department of EducationSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1986
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.