Legal Opinion
Statewide Grievance Committee v. Egbarin
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided January 23, 2001No. AC 19801PublishedCited by 27 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
HENNESSY, J.
The defendant, Nitor Egbarin, an attorney licensed to practice law in the state of Connecticut, appeals from the judgment rendered on a presentment in which the trial court concluded that the defendant was guilty of professional misconduct in violation of rule 8.4 (3)1 of the Rules of Professional Conduct2 and suspended him from the practice of law for five years.3 On appeal, the defendant claims that the court (1) improperly found that he violated the Rules of Professional Conduct because rule 8.4 (3) is unconstitutionally vague and overbroad, (2) improperly found that he…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Berry v. LoiseauSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1992
- In Re DurantSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1907
- Hayward v. PlantSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1923
- State v. PeckSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1914
- Jutkowitz v. Department of Health ServicesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1991
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- Briggs v. McWeenySupreme Court of Connecticut · 2002
- Notopoulos v. Statewide Grievance CommitteeSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2006
- In re Vincent D.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2001
- Martinez v. ZovichConnecticut Appellate Court · 2005
- Daniels v. Statewide Grievance CommitteeConnecticut Appellate Court · 2002
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.