Legal Opinion

Benasra v. Marciano

California Court of Appeal

Decided October 9, 2001No. B143431PublishedCited by 44 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

VOGEL (MIRIAM A.), J.

This is a libel action in which the defendants (a corporation and its president) claim the plaintiff (an individual) ought to be compelled to arbitrate simply because he is president of another corporation that had a licensing agreement with the defendant corporation. The essence of the defendants’ position is that the plaintiff, who happens to have signed the licensing agreement as president of another corporation, is bound by the arbitration provision in that agreement either as an agent of the corporation or as a third party beneficiary of the licensing…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. McCarthy v. AzureCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1994
  2. Norcal Mutual Insurance Company v. NewtonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2000
  3. Berman v. Dean Witter & Co., Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1975
  4. Boyd v. Homes of Legend, Inc.District Court, M.D. Alabama · 1997
  5. Dryer v. Los Angeles RamsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by44 opinions

  1. Comedy Club, Inc. v. Improv West AssociatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
  2. Aguilar v. LernerCalifornia Supreme Court · 2004
  3. Young Seok Suh v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2010
  4. Rowe v. ExlineCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2007
  5. Westra v. Marcus & Millichap Real Estate Investment Brokerage Co.California Court of Appeal · 2005

39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API