Legal Opinion
Dryer v. Los Angeles Rams
California Supreme Court
Decided December 5, 1985No. L.A. 31889PublishedCited by 66 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
KAUS, J.*
Defendant Los Angeles Rams (Rams) and individual codefendants appeal from an order of the Los Angeles Superior Court denying their petition to compel arbitration. Basing its ruling on Graham v. Scissor-Tail, Inc. (1981) 28 Cal.3d 807 [171 Cal.Rptr. 604, 623 P.2d 165], the trial court held that the arbitration procedure established by the National Football League (NFL) collective bargaining agreement fails to satisfy the requisite “minimum levels of integrity” and is therefore unenforceable. We conclude that the petition to compel arbitration should have been granted. Not only…
2Cases cited38 opinions
- United Steelworkers v. Warrior & Gulf Navigation Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1960
- Textile Workers v. Lincoln Mills of Ala.Supreme Court of the United States · 1957
- United Steelworkers v. American Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1960
- Southland Corp. v. KeatingSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Local 174, Teamsters, Chauffeurs, Warehousemen & Helpers v. Lucas Flour Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by66 opinions
- Stirlen v. Supercuts, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1997
- 24 Hour Fitness, Inc. v. Superior Court of Sonoma Cty.California Court of Appeal · 1998
- Bruch v. Firestone Tire & Rubber Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1987
- Molecular Analytical Systems v. Ciphergen Biosystems, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2010
- Bruch v. Firestone Tire And Rubber CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1987
61 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.