Legal Opinion

Norcal Mutual Insurance Company v. Newton

California Court of Appeal

Decided October 10, 2000No. A086152PublishedCited by 80 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

KLINE, P. J.

NORCAL Mutual Insurance Company (NORCAL) appeals from the trial court’s denial of its petition to compel arbitration of a dispute with respondent Nancy Newton. NORCAL maintains the petition should have been granted because respondent was required to arbitrate by the language of the medical malpractice insurance policy it issued to respondent’s late husband, by respondent’s acceptance of the benefits of the policy, and by respondent’s initiation of arbitration against NORCAL. We conclude the trial court’s order must be reversed.

Statement of the Case and Facts

Dr. Harvey…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Egan v. Mutual of Omaha InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
  2. Lucas v. HammCalifornia Supreme Court · 1961
  3. Badie v. Bank of AmericaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1998
  4. Madden v. Kaiser Foundation HospitalsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
  5. Blanton v. Womancare, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1985

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by80 opinions

  1. Comedy Club, Inc. v. Improv West AssociatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
  2. Szetela v. Discover BankCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2002
  3. Ajamian v. Cantorco2e. L.P.California Court of Appeal · 2012
  4. Abramson v. Juniper Networks, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2004
  5. Metalclad Corp. v. Ventana Environmental Organizational PartnershipCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2003

75 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API