Legal Opinion

Young Seok Suh v. Superior Court

California Court of Appeal

Decided February 18, 2010No. B219174PublishedCited by 48 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

MOSK, J.—

INTRODUCTION

Petitioners and plaintiffs Young Seok Suh and Yongkew Chung (plaintiffs) are anesthesiologists who were with a medical group that entered into two anesthesiology contracts with a hospital. They seek review of an order by the trial court compelling arbitration. We grant their petition for writ of mandate, holding that plaintiffs did not agree to arbitrate disputes relating to one of the contracts and that the terms of the arbitration clause in the other contract are, because of the applicable rules limiting damage remedies, unconscionable, rendering the agreement to…

2Cases cited37 opinions

  1. Armendariz v. Found. Health Psychcare Servs., Inc.California Supreme Court · 2000
  2. Engalla v. Permanente Medical Group, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1997
  3. Moncharsh v. Heily & BlaseCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992
  4. Gentry v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 2007
  5. Stirlen v. Supercuts, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1997

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by48 opinions

  1. Garcia v. Pexco, LLCCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2017
  2. DMS Services, LLC v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2012
  3. Cohen v. TNP 2008 Participating Notes Program, LLC, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2019
  4. Jensen v. U-Haul Co. of Cal., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2017
  5. Jenks v. DLA Piper Rudnick Gray Cary US LLPCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2015

43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API