Legal Opinion

Aguilar v. Lerner

California Supreme Court

Decided April 22, 2004No. S099667PublishedCited by 101 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

WERDEGAR, J.

When plaintiff Raul V. Aguilar hired defendant Esther R. Lerner to represent him in a marital dissolution matter, he signed a written retainer agreement that included an agreement to arbitrate any dispute “concerning fees ... or any other claim relating to [plaintiff’s] legal matter which arises out of [plaintiff’s] legal representation.” Such an agreement normally would be enforceable under the California Arbitration Act (CAA). (Code Civ. Proc., § 1280 et seq.) A dispute arose, and plaintiff now contends this arbitration agreement is invalid, specifically as to defendant’s…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Southland Corp. v. KeatingSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Moncharsh v. Heily & BlaseCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992
  3. Vandenberg v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1999
  4. Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. v. Intel Corp.California Supreme Court · 1994
  5. Broughton v. Cigna HealthplansCalifornia Supreme Court · 1999

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by101 opinions

  1. People v. Bryant, Smith and WheelerCalifornia Supreme Court · 2014
  2. Cable Connection, Inc. v. DirecTV, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2008
  3. MW Erectors, Inc. v. Niederhauser Ornamental & Metal Works Co.California Supreme Court · 2005
  4. Beatie and Osborn LLP v. Patriot Scientific Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 2006
  5. People v. SuffCalifornia Supreme Court · 2014

96 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API