Aguilar v. Lerner
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
WERDEGAR, J.
When plaintiff Raul V. Aguilar hired defendant Esther R. Lerner to represent him in a marital dissolution matter, he signed a written retainer agreement that included an agreement to arbitrate any dispute “concerning fees ... or any other claim relating to [plaintiff’s] legal matter which arises out of [plaintiff’s] legal representation.” Such an agreement normally would be enforceable under the California Arbitration Act (CAA). (Code Civ. Proc., § 1280 et seq.) A dispute arose, and plaintiff now contends this arbitration agreement is invalid, specifically as to defendant’s…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Southland Corp. v. KeatingSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Moncharsh v. Heily & BlaseCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992
- Vandenberg v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1999
- Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. v. Intel Corp.California Supreme Court · 1994
- Broughton v. Cigna HealthplansCalifornia Supreme Court · 1999
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by101 opinions
- People v. Bryant, Smith and WheelerCalifornia Supreme Court · 2014
- Cable Connection, Inc. v. DirecTV, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2008
- MW Erectors, Inc. v. Niederhauser Ornamental & Metal Works Co.California Supreme Court · 2005
- Beatie and Osborn LLP v. Patriot Scientific Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 2006
- People v. SuffCalifornia Supreme Court · 2014
96 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.