Legal Opinion

Bouldin v. Sheerer

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided February 25, 1920No. Civil No. 1756PublishedCited by 3 opinions

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of the County of Cochise. A. C. Lockwood, Judge.

1Per curiam

No assignments of error have been filed by appellant or appear in the briefs filed. We have decided in a long line of cases that, in the absence of any assignment of error, and none appearing upon the face of the record, the appeal may be either dismissed or the judgment affirmed. Maricopa County v. Jordan, 7 Ariz. 4, 60 Pac. 693; Gardner v. Gardner, 7 Ariz. 73, 60 Pac. 875; Trimble et al. v. Long, 6 Ariz. 268, 56 Pac. 731; Daggs et al. v. Field, 6 Ariz. 47, 52 Pac. 773; Daggs et al. v. Hoskins et al., 5 Ariz. 236, 52 Pac. 350; Putnam v. Putnam, 3 Ariz. 182, 24 Pac. 320.; Wolfley v. Gila…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Putnam v. PutnamArizona Supreme Court · 1890
  2. Wolfley v. Gila River Irrigation Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1890
  3. Daggs v. HoskinsArizona Supreme Court · 1898
  4. Maricopa County v. JordanArizona Supreme Court · 1900
  5. Daggs v. FieldArizona Supreme Court · 1898

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Hansen v. HansenArizona Supreme Court · 1924
  2. City of Phoenix v. JonesArizona Supreme Court · 1920
  3. Butler v. Va SantArizona Supreme Court · 1961

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API