City of Phoenix v. Jones
Arizona Supreme Court
APPEAL from an order of the Superior Court of the County of Maricopa. R. C. Stanford, Judge.
1Per curiam
This appeal must be dismissed for two reasons:
■ First. It is from an order sustaining a general and special demurrer to the complaint. It is not from a final judgment or any order under the statute (paragraph 1227, Civ. Code) made appealable. It has several times been decided by this court that an appeal from an order sustaining a demurrer will not lie. Aiton v. Board, 13 Ariz. 74, 108 Pac. 221; Gonzales v. Duey, 15 Ariz. 331, 138 Pac. 1043; Navajo-*433Apache Bank & Trust Co. v. Desmont, 17 Ariz. 472, 154 Pac. 206; Hollingsworth v. Gazette Printing Co., ante, p. 51, 185 Pac. 359; Herman v.…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Navajo-Apache Bank & Trust Co. v. DesmontArizona Supreme Court · 1916
- Hollingsworth v. Gazette Printing Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1919
- Aiton v. Board of Medical ExaminersArizona Supreme Court · 1910
- Bouldin v. SheererArizona Supreme Court · 1920
- Gonzales v. Duey & OverlockArizona Supreme Court · 1914
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Miller v. Arizona BankArizona Supreme Court · 1935