Daggs v. Field
Arizona Supreme Court
APPEAL from a judgment of the District Court of the Fourth Judicial District in and for the County of Coconino. Owen T. Bouse, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtDavis, J.
There are no sufficient assignments of error made by the appellants in their brief. The act of the legislature approved March 18, 1897, relating to appeals and writs of error, under the provisions of which this appeal is taken, provides, among other things, that “the brief of the plaintiff in error, or appellant, shall . . . contain a distinct enumeration in the form of propositions of the several errors relied on, and all errors not assigned in the printed brief shall be deemed to have been waived.” The rules of the court likewise provide that all assignments of error must distinctly specify…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Daggs v. HoskinsArizona Supreme Court · 1898
3Cited by2 opinions
- Bouldin v. SheererArizona Supreme Court · 1920
- Maricopa County v. JordanArizona Supreme Court · 1900