Legal Opinion

Hansen v. Hansen

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided April 17, 1924No. Civil No. 2138PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRoss, J.

— The appellant has not in her brief or elsewhere made any assignments of error. Paragraph 1231 of the Civil Code 1913 provides:

*293“Upon appeal from a final judgment the court shall review all orders and rulings made by the court below, which are assigned as error, whether a motion for a new trial is made or not. ’ ’

Paragraph 1261, Id., after providing for the filing of brief by the appellant, requires that it contain, among* other things:

“A statement of the case, an assignment of the errors relied upon, separately stated, and the argument and authorities in support thereof.”

There does not seem…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Wootan v. RotenArizona Supreme Court · 1917
  2. Bouldin v. SheererArizona Supreme Court · 1920

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Wilburn v. ReitmanArizona Supreme Court · 1939
  2. Butler v. Va SantArizona Supreme Court · 1961

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API