Legal Opinion
Hansen v. Hansen
Arizona Supreme Court
Decided April 17, 1924No. Civil No. 2138PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtRoss, J.
— The appellant has not in her brief or elsewhere made any assignments of error. Paragraph 1231 of the Civil Code 1913 provides:
*293“Upon appeal from a final judgment the court shall review all orders and rulings made by the court below, which are assigned as error, whether a motion for a new trial is made or not. ’ ’
Paragraph 1261, Id., after providing for the filing of brief by the appellant, requires that it contain, among* other things:
“A statement of the case, an assignment of the errors relied upon, separately stated, and the argument and authorities in support thereof.”
There does not seem…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Wootan v. RotenArizona Supreme Court · 1917
- Bouldin v. SheererArizona Supreme Court · 1920
3Cited by2 opinions
- Wilburn v. ReitmanArizona Supreme Court · 1939
- Butler v. Va SantArizona Supreme Court · 1961