Legal Opinion

Daggs v. Hoskins

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided February 23, 1898No. Civil No. 619PublishedCited by 3 opinions

APPEAL from a judgment of the District Court of the Fourth Judicial District in and for the County of Coconino. Owen T. Rouse, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Per curiam

There are no sufficient assignments of error made by, the appellants in their brief. The aet of the legislature approved March 18, 1897, relating to appeals and writs of error, under the provisions of which this appeal is taken, provides, among other things, that “the brief of the plaintiff in error, or appellant, shall also next contain a distinct enumeration in the form of propositions of the several errors relied on, and all errors not assigned in the printed brief shall be deemed to have been, waived. ’ ’ The rules of this court, likewise, provide that all assignments of error must…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. Bouldin v. SheererArizona Supreme Court · 1920
  2. Maricopa County v. JordanArizona Supreme Court · 1900
  3. Daggs v. FieldArizona Supreme Court · 1898

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API