Legal Opinion

Putnam v. Putnam

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided April 18, 1890No. Civil No. 271PublishedCited by 28 opinions

APPEAL from a judgment of the District Court of. the Second Judicial District in and for the County of Pinal. William W. Porter, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtKibbey, J.

This was an action in the lower court, by J. D. Putnam against C. D. Putnam, for a dissolution of a partnership alleged to have theretofore existed between them, and for an accounting, and praying for an injunction restraining the sheriff of Pinal County from selling a band of cattle, alleged to be partnership property, which had been levied upon and advertised at the instance of the intervener. The appellants, Sutherland et al., intervened, alleging themselves to be creditors,of C. D. Putnam, denying the existence of'the partnership, and claiming the property levied upon to be the individual…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. G., C. & Santa Fe R. R. Co. v. EddinsTexas Supreme Court · 1884
  2. Burr v. LewisTexas Supreme Court · 1851
  3. Harrell v. Mexico Cattle Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1889
  4. Young v. MartinSupreme Court of the United States · 1869
  5. Jacobs v. HawkinsTexas Supreme Court · 1884

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. McClinton v. RiceArizona Supreme Court · 1953
  2. Miami Copper Co. v. StrohlArizona Supreme Court · 1913
  3. Whitney v. DeweyIdaho Supreme Court · 1905
  4. State v. HicksSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1894
  5. Tietjen v. SneadArizona Supreme Court · 1890

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API