Smith v. New Hampshire Board of Examiners of Psychologists
Supreme Court of New Hampshire
1Opinion of the CourtBrock, C.J.
The defendant, the New Hampshire Board of Examiners of Psychologists (the board), appeals an order of the Superior Court {Manias, J.) granting the plaintiffs’ motion for summary judgment and permanent injunctive relief. Because we conclude that the trial court erred in granting the plaintiffs permanent injunctive relief, we reverse its order.
The plaintiffs, Roland Spencer Smith and Wayne L. Smith, are unrelated, practicing psychologists who share clinical offices in Concord. In September 1990, the board received a complaint (the initial complaint) against Roland Smith from a former patient.…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- In re GrimmSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1993
- In Re Russell C.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1980
- Appeal of PlantierSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1985
- In re Robyn W.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1983
- State ex rel. McLellan v. CavanaughSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1985
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Hughes v. New Hampshire Division of AeronauticsSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2005
- Appeal of MartinoSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1994
- Appeal of Union Telephone Co.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 2010
- Atwater v. Town of PlainfieldSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2010
- In re SmithSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1994
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.