Legal Opinion
City of Claremont v. Truell
Supreme Court of New Hampshire
Decided February 7, 1985No. 83-206; No. 84-123PublishedCited by 22 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtDouglas, J.
These are two separate, but consolidated, cases involving issues of liability for child placement costs. The defendants in No. 83-206, Elroy and Doris Truell, appeal an order of the Claremont District Court holding them liable for the expenses incurred in the placement of their child pursuant to RSA chapter 169-D (Supp. 1983). The Fosters, defendants in No. 84-123, appeal an order of the superior court permitting the Town of Walpole to place a real estate lien on their home pursuant to RSA 165:28 to secure reimbursement for expenses incurred under RSA chapter 169-D (Supp. 1983).
*33I. Truell
On…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Fuentes v. ShevinSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Mennonite Board of Missions v. AdamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Barlow v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1833
- Topolewski v. Plankinton Packing Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1910
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Henry Malachowski and Julia Malachowski v. City of KeeneCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1986
- Appeal of PlantierSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1985
- In re BagleySupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1986
- Douglas v. DouglasSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1999
- Dow v. Town of EffinghamSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2002
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.