Tennessee-Carolina Transportation, Inc. v. Strick Corp.
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
MOORE, Justice.
The sales contract here involved was executed in Pennsylvania but was to be performed by delivery of the trailers in Illinois. Defendant now contends that the substantive law of the place of performance (Illinois) controls the question of breach of implied warranty and, if there was a breach, the measure of damages.
In the former opinion in this case we stated:
“. . . [T]he parties have not contended that any law other than the law of Pennsylvania shall govern. We proceed accordingly, noting only that the contract of sale did not attempt to choose the applicable law, but each of…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Hayes v. City of WilmingtonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1956
- MacDougall v. Ford Motor Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1969
- Pinnix v. . GriffinSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1942
- Greco v. Bucciconi Engineering CompanyDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1967
- Tennessee Carolina Transportation, Inc. v. Strick Corp.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1973
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by61 opinions
- Bernick v. JurdenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1982
- Tanglewood Land Co., Inc. v. ByrdSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1980
- North Carolina National Bank v. Virginia Carolina BuildersSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1983
- Morrison v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1987
- Robinson v. Seaboard System RR, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1987
56 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.