Bernick v. Jurden
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
MEYER, Justice.
The major issue in this case is whether the trial court erred in granting summary judgment in favor of the defendants Cooper of Canada, Ltd. and Cooper International, Inc. In order to decide this issue, we must first determine whether plaintiff’s appeal is premature. Then, we must answer several other questions: (1) which jurisdiction’s law applies to plaintiff’s warranty claims, (2) what is the applicable statute of limitations to plaintiff’s warranty claims, (3) whether reliance must be alleged on the express warranty claim, (4) whether privity is required on the implied…
2Cases cited33 opinions
- Veazey v. City of DurhamSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1950
- Dickens v. PuryearSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1981
- Koontz v. City of Winston-SalemSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1972
- Page v. SloanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1972
- Waters v. Qualified Personnel, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1978
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by192 opinions
- Boudreau v. BaughmanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1988
- Collingwood v. General Electric Real Estate Equities, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1989
- Roumillat v. Simplistic Enterprises, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1992
- DeWitt v. Eveready Battery Co., Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 2002
- Tom Togs, Inc. v. Ben Elias Industries Corp.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1986
187 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.