Robinson v. Seaboard System RR, Inc.
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
MARTIN, Judge.
Southern Railway Company’s Appeal
The primary question raised by the twenty-one assignments of error brought forward and argued in the appellant’s brief filed by Southern is whether the evidence was sufficient to warrant submission of the issues of willful and wanton negligence and punitive damages to the jury. Although the question is a close one, we conclude that the issues were appropriately submitted. We have also reviewed carefully Southern’s other contentions and find no prejudicial error.
Southern has assigned error to several of the trial court’s evidentiary rulings. The…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- State v. BullardSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1984
- State v. CovingtonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1976
- Hinson v. DawsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1956
- Foster v. . HymanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1929
- DiDonato v. WortmanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1987
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by52 opinions
- Lord v. Customized Consulting Specialty, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2007
- Holloway v. Wachovia Bank & Trust Co., NASupreme Court of North Carolina · 1994
- Turner v. Norfolk Southern Corp.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2000
- Barringer v. FORSYTH COUNTY WAKE FOREST UNIVERSITY BAPTIST MEDICAL CTRCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2009
- Bass v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2002
47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.