Morrison v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
MITCHELL, Justice.
The sole issue before us is whether the Court of Appeals erred in affirming the trial court’s entry of summary judgment for the defendant Sears, Roebuck and Company (hereinafter “Sears”) on the plaintiffs’ claims for a breach of an implied warranty of merchantability. We hold that the Court of Appeals erred in that regard.
The plaintiffs, Wanda Jean Morrison and her husband, Michael Morrison, brought suit against Sears alleging that Mrs. Morrison bought a pair of high-heeled shoes from a Sears store in the spring of 1981. They alleged that on 2 April 1981, the second time she…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Dickens v. PuryearSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1981
- Walla Walla City v. Walla Walla Water Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1898
- Caldwell v. DeeseSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1975
- Page v. SloanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1972
- Campbell v. First Baptist Church of DurhamSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1979
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by55 opinions
- Boudreau v. BaughmanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1988
- DeWitt v. Eveready Battery Co., Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 2002
- Pulley v. Rex HospitalSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1990
- Goodman v. Wenco Foods, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1992
- Alford v. ShawSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1990
50 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.