Legal Opinion
In Re Cuozzo Speed Technologies, LLC
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Decided July 8, 2015No. 2014-1301PublishedCited by 101 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion for the court filed by Circuit Judge DYK.
Dissenting opinion filed by Circuit Judge NEWMAN.
DYK, Circuit Judge.
Cuozzo Speed Technologies (“Cuozzo”) owns U.S. Patent No. 6,778,074 (the “'074 patent”). Garmin International, Inc. and Garmin USA, Inc. (collectively, “Garmin”) petitioned the United States Patent and Trademark Office (“PTO”) for inter partes review (“IPR”) of claims 10, 14, and 17 of the '074 patent. The PTO granted Gar-min’s petition and instituted IPR. The Patent Trial and Appeal Board (the “Board”) timely issued a final decision finding claims 10, 14, and 17 obvious. The…
2Cases cited42 opinions
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Graham v. John Deere Co. of Kansas CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- United States v. Mead Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2001
- Edward H. Phillips v. Awh Corporation, Hopeman Brothers, Inc., and Lofton Corporation, Defendants-CrossCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2006
- Kerr v. United States Dist. Court for Northern Dist. of Cal.Supreme Court of the United States · 1976
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by101 opinions
- Cuozzo Speed Technologies, LLC v. LeeSupreme Court of the United States · 2016
- Versata Development Group, Inc. v. SAP America, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2015
- Apple, Inc. v. Ameranth, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2016
- In Re Magnum Oil Tools International, Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2016
- Shaw Industries Group, Inc. v. Automated Creel Systems, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2016
96 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.