Legal Opinion

Baker & Strawn v. Magnolia Petroleum Co.

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided March 2, 1926No. 15738PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

RUTH, C.

The parties hereto will be designated as they appeared in the trial court.

The petition of plaintiffs contained two' causes of action, and they elected to stand upon the first cause of action, which alleged, in substance, that plaintiffs and defendant were owners of adjoining leaseholds in Carter county, and plaintiffs had a number of oil and gas wells on its leasehold, and well-No. 8 was flowing oil and gas on October 6, 1920, and had been so flowing for several days prior to said date, which fact was well known to defendant, its servants and agents, etc. That defendant…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Hogan v. BaileySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1910
  2. Kkk Medicine Co. v. HarringtonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1921
  3. McGhee v. HurstSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
  4. Metropolitan Life Ins. Co. v. PlunkettSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1925
  5. Wilson v. Central State Bank of MuskogeeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Freshour v. TurnerCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1972
  2. Avery v. GoodrichSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1929
  3. Pollard v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1974
  4. Bruce Transfer Co. v. JohnstonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1939
  5. W. T. Rawleigh Co. v. CateSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1934

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API