Legal Opinion

Wilson v. Central State Bank of Muskogee

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided October 2, 1923No. 11887PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

STEPHENSON, C.

This appeal involves the consideration of the ruling of the trial court in granting the plaintiff a new trial. The plaintiff commenced its action against the defendant for the possession of one automobile for the purpose of foreclosure under chattel mortgage held by the plaintiff. The defendant answered that he was the owner of the property, without. notice, and for a valuable consideration. The defendant alleged that the chattel mortgage in question was taken by plaintiff on automobiles in the possession of the mortgagor, and then being offered for sale in the regular…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Trower v. RobertsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1907
  2. Hughes v. Chicago, R. I. & P. Ry. Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
  3. Kennett v. KiddSupreme Court of Kansas · 1913

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Alexander v. AlexanderSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1937
  2. Negrate v. GunterSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1955
  3. Baker & Strawn v. Magnolia Petroleum Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1926
  4. Peoples Finance & Thrift Co. v. FerrierSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1942
  5. W. T. Rawleigh Co. v. CateSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1934

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API