Wilson v. Central State Bank of Muskogee
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
STEPHENSON, C.
This appeal involves the consideration of the ruling of the trial court in granting the plaintiff a new trial. The plaintiff commenced its action against the defendant for the possession of one automobile for the purpose of foreclosure under chattel mortgage held by the plaintiff. The defendant answered that he was the owner of the property, without. notice, and for a valuable consideration. The defendant alleged that the chattel mortgage in question was taken by plaintiff on automobiles in the possession of the mortgagor, and then being offered for sale in the regular…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Trower v. RobertsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1907
- Hughes v. Chicago, R. I. & P. Ry. Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
- Kennett v. KiddSupreme Court of Kansas · 1913
3Cited by10 opinions
- Alexander v. AlexanderSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1937
- Negrate v. GunterSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1955
- Baker & Strawn v. Magnolia Petroleum Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1926
- Peoples Finance & Thrift Co. v. FerrierSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1942
- W. T. Rawleigh Co. v. CateSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1934
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.