W. T. Rawleigh Co. v. Cate
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
1Opinion of the CourtMeNEILL, J.
This is the second appeal in this case. See Beard et al. v. W. T. Rawleigh Co., 136 Okla. 165, 277 P. 657. The sole question involved in the former appeal was limited to the contended assignment of error of the trial court in sustaining a motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict of the jury.
This court reversed the action of the trial court, and held that in the absence of special findings it was error to render such a judgment, unless the parties in whose favor said judgment Whs rendered were entitled to ■judgment on the pleadings. The cause was accordingly remanded, with directions…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Hogan v. BaileySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1910
- Trower v. RobertsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1907
- Catlin v. ReedSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1929
- Linderman v. NolanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1905
- National Surety Co. v. MiozranySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Shreve v. CornellSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1938
- Bailey v. SissonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1937
- A. & A. Taxicab Co. v. McCainSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1937
- Burke Greis Co. v. BallardSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1948
- Nichols Transfer & Storage Co. v. LumpkinSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1937
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.