Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

McGhee v. Hurst

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided July 17, 1923No. 11406PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

JONES, C.

This ease was originally instituted in the district court of Ottawa county, Okla., an the 16th day of September, 1918, by the filing in said court of the xietition on behalf of the plaintiffs in the trial court, E. A. Hurst and Ollie Hurst, against T. J. McGhee and W. M. Scott.

The petition, in substance, alleges that the plaintiffs were husband and wife; and that in March, 1918, they visited the Miami lead and zinc fields, and while in the city of Miami, met the defendants who informed x>laintiffis they could secure a desirable mining lease; that they referred them to the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Trower v. RobertsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1907
  2. Anderson v. ChrismanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
  3. St. Louis, I. M. & S. R. Co. v. LowreySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
  4. Freeman v. Farmers' & Merchants' BankSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Alexander v. AlexanderSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1937
  2. Negrate v. GunterSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1955
  3. Baker & Strawn v. Magnolia Petroleum Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1926
  4. Peoples Finance & Thrift Co. v. FerrierSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1942
  5. Metropolitan Life Ins. Co. v. PlunkettSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1925

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API