Legal Opinion
Smith v. City of Riverside
California Court of Appeal
Decided October 9, 1973No. Civ. 12434PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
TAMURA, J.
The City of Riverside is a charter city which operates its own water and electrical utility systems. Pursuant to a charter provision permitting the city council to except projects for the extension or development of city-operated public utilities from a general charter requirement of public bidding, 1 the city council elected to use city employees rather than private contractors to effect construction and installation of certain types of city electrical and water facilities. 2 This is an action for declaratory relief and injunction challenging the validity of the city’s…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Purdy & Fitzpatrick v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969
- Bishop v. City of San JoseCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969
- Pipoly v. BensonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
- Professional Fire Fighters, Inc. v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1963
- City of Pasadena v. CharlevilleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1932
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Associated Builders & Contractors, Inc. v. San Francisco Airports CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1999
- CEEED v. California Coastal Zone Conservation CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1974
- Domar Electric, Inc. v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1994
- Huntington Beach Police Officers' Ass'n v. City of Huntington BeachCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1976
- O. G. Sansone Co. v. Department of TransportationCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1976
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.