Legal Opinion
CEEED v. California Coastal Zone Conservation Commission
California Court of Appeal
Decided November 19, 1974No. Civ. 13691PublishedCited by 69 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
TAMURA, J.
This appeal involves the constitutionality of the Coastal Zone Conservation Act of 1972 (Pub. Resources Code, § 27000 et seq.). Plaintiffs 2 brought a declaratory relief action alleging that the Act is on its face subject to numerous constitutional infirmities. The court below upheld the constitutionality of the Act against each and all of the attacks and entered judgment accordingly. Plaintiffs appeal from the judgment.
Preliminarily, we shall review the salient features of the statute under review.
Proposed as an initiative measure known as “Proposition 20,” the Act was…
2Cases cited91 opinions
- Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Goldberg v. KellySupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Shapiro v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Boddie v. ConnecticutSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Dunn v. BlumsteinSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
86 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by69 opinions
- Pacific Legal Foundation v. California Coastal CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982
- Avco Community Developers, Inc. v. South Coast Regional CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
- Askew v. Cross Key WaterwaysSupreme Court of Florida · 1978
- Committee of Seven Thousand v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988
- Construction Industry Association of Sonoma County, a California Nonprofit Corporation v. The City of Petaluma, a California Charter CityCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1975
64 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.