People v. Angeloni
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
BUCKLEY, J.
Convicted after jury trial of transportation and possession for sale of controlled substances, 2 defendant appeals from the judgment of conviction. Defendant’s sole contention on appeal is that his criminal prosecution violated the proscriptions against double jeopardy in the United States and California Constitutions because of the government’s prior nonjudicial forfeiture of money seized from the vehicle that defendant drove at the time of his arrest. We will affirm.
Procedural and Factual Summary
The trial court denied defendant’s pretrial motion to dismiss the charges on…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Serfass v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- United States v. Renato TorresCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1994
- People v. Superior Court (Marks)California Supreme Court · 1991
- United States v. Frank L. BairdCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1995
- United States v. Jonathan PennyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1995
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- People v. PrinceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1996
- Cuevas v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2013
- People v. $2,709 United States CurrencyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2014
- Cuevas v. Super. Ct.California Court of Appeal · 2013