Legal Opinion

United States v. Frank L. Baird

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided September 12, 1995No. 95-1202PublishedCited by 99 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

LEWIS, Circuit Judge.

In this appeal, the appellant, Frank L. Baird (“Baird”), seeks dismissal on double jeopardy grounds of a superseding indictment charging him with violations of federal criminal law. He argues that as a result of a prior administrative forfeiture of monies seized from his residence, he has already been once “punished” for the offenses alleged in the indictment. A subsequent criminal prosecution would, he argues, run afoul of the Double Jeopardy Clause.

To assess the merits of Baird’s unusual double jeopardy argument, we must determine whether Baird was…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Cohen v. Beneficial Industrial Loan Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1949
  2. North Carolina v. PearceSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  3. Green v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  4. United States v. HalperSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  5. Austin v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1993

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by99 opinions

  1. United States v. Diana Gonzales Buchanan, Fedell Anderson, Vernon Bonner, and John BuchananCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1996
  2. United States v. Keith JamesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1996
  3. United States v. Brigido Marmolejo, Jr. And Mario SalinasCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1996
  4. United States v. All Assets of G.P.S. Automotive Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1995
  5. United States v. Robert S. StollerCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1996

94 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API