Legal Opinion

People v. Superior Court (Marks)

California Supreme Court

Decided December 19, 1991No. S013832PublishedCited by 123 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

ARABIAN, J.

I. Introduction

We confront in this case the interplay of two otherwise unrelated constitutional concerns: the prohibition against being twice put in jeopardy and the right of a criminal defendant to be mentally as well as physically present at trial. In deciding whether real party in interest John Marks 1 may invoke the protections of the double jeopardy clause, we first consider whether a trial court suffers a fundamental loss of jurisdiction when it subjects a defendant to trial without first determining that he has the requisite capacity to understand, consult, and assist…

2Cases cited108 opinions

  1. Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. North Carolina v. PearceSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  3. Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  4. Delaware v. Van ArsdallSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  5. Arizona v. FulminanteSupreme Court of the United States · 1991

103 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by123 opinions

  1. In Re HarrisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1993
  2. People v. PoseyCalifornia Supreme Court · 2004
  3. People v. MendozaCalifornia Supreme Court · 2000
  4. People v. SaundersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1993
  5. People v. LeonardCalifornia Supreme Court · 2007

118 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API