People v. $2,709 United States Currency
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
HOFFSTADT, J.
The People may initiate a civil proceeding to forfeit seized cash or its equivalent connected to drug trafficking. (Health & Saf. Code, §§ 11488.4, subd. (a), 11470, subd. (f).) When the amount to be forfeited is less than $25,000 in value, the property’s owner must be convicted of a drug crime and “the issue of forfeiture shall be tried in conjunction” with the related criminal case. (§ 11488.4, subd. (i)(5); see id., subd. (i)(2), (3).) Does the rule requiring simultaneous trial apply when the defendant enters a plea to the criminal charges? We conclude it does not, and…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Murphy v. Kenneth Cole Productions, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2007
- Bahl v. Bank of AmericaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2001
- Etalook v. Exxon Pipeline Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
- Kurokawa v. BlumCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1988
- Baeza v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Inzunza v. NaranjoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2023
- Ochoa v. T.M Duche Nut Co. CA5California Court of Appeal · 2020
- Ochoa v. T.M Duche Nut Co. CA5California Court of Appeal · 2020