Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

People v. Prince

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 25, 1996No. A067920PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

STEIN, J.

The People appeal an order dismissing the information charging William Lawrence Prince with several offenses, including the manufacture, and possession for sale of methamphetamine. (Health & Saf. Code, §§ 11379.6, 11378.) The court found that criminal prosecution was barred, under the double jeopardy clause, because in separate civil forfeiture proceedings the court had granted the government’s motion for entry of default after Prince failed to answer. Prince filed a motion to set aside the defaults, and all further proceedings in the civil forfeiture cases were stayed until…

2Cases cited53 opinions

  1. United States v. DixonSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  2. United States v. HalperSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  3. Whalen v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  4. Austin v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  5. Serfass v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1975

48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. People v. Wolfe, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
  2. People v. Superior Court (Moore)California Court of Appeal · 1996
  3. People v. WolfeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2018
  4. State v. NunezNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1999
  5. State v. NunezNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1999

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API