Legal Opinion

Cuevas v. Superior Court

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 6, 2013No. F064886PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

PEÑA, J.—

INTRODUCTION

This case concerns the law of asset forfeiture and, more particularly, the procedures regarding forfeiture of property connected with unlawful drug activity, as governed by sections 11470 through 11489 of the Health and Safety Code. The questions presented are (1) May a policing agency rather than a prosecuting agency initiate these forfeiture proceedings? and (2) Is substantial compliance or something less than strict compliance with the notice requirements of the forfeiture statutes sufficient to lawfully uphold the forfeiture? Our answer to both questions is…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. People v. Superior Court (Plascencia)California Court of Appeal · 2002
  2. Nasir v. Sacramento County Office of District AttorneyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1992
  3. People v. $28,500 United States CurrencyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1996
  4. People v. One 1986 Toyota PickupCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1995
  5. People v. Property Listed in Exhibit OneCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1991

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Ramirez v. Tulare County District Attorney's OfficeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2017
  2. People v. Super. Ct. (Vandenburgh)California Court of Appeal · 2025
  3. Vincent v. SonkeyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API